1
edit
Changes
→Test Notes
| 104 || [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/reflections/ Reflections] || Crystal de Nobrega || Sept 17, 2010 || Significantly slower than Chromium. Minefield: ~4-16fps Chromium: ~14-50fps || Objects were choppy when spinning (gets worse the more polygons the model had). Object rotation is choppy (sometimes freezes). || Minefield froze when I tried to adjust the size of the Browser window, then my whole computer froze. CPU usage in Minefield: 51% Chromium: 50%. Response is good as far as selecting models and textures goes. || Extremely slow and extremely choppy. This experiment was pretty cool (first two models) until I saw how fast and smooth Chromium could run them...
|-
| 105 || [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/blob/ Blob] || Crystal de Nobrega || Sept 17, 2010 || - Nice. || - Nice. || - Nice. || -Blob seems about equal in Minefield and Chromium. Problems in Minefield when starting the experiment: either [http://www.flickr.com/photos/54074543@N08/4998179832/ the blob wasn't a blob] (and the experiment didn't work) or [http://www.flickr.com/photos/54074543@N08/4998179836/ there were some markings at the top of the screen that would disappear as you play].
|-
| 106 || [http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/canvas-cycle/ Canvas Cycle] || Crystal de Nobrega || Sept 17, 2010 || - || - || - || -
