User:Vesper/FSOSS 08

From CDOT Wiki
< User:Vesper
Revision as of 21:48, 2 November 2008 by Vesper (talk | contribs)
Jump to: navigation, search

Here's the stub for my FSOSS 2007 paper. ^^;;


Workshops I attended:

  • ohai! art! - Pure Data Workshop

Presentations I attended:

  • Enabling Healthy Open Source Communities: Case study -- Thunderbird
  • Protecting You with Exploit Me
  • The Convergence of Open Access and Open Source


Finish date: tba


Building the Thunderbird Community

Speaker's Background:


Views on Open Source:


Open Source versus Open Access

The speaker didn't focus on Open Source at all. He went on and on about what Open Access meant, and how it was changing with the introduction of newer technologies.


Topic Summary: Open Access

Open Access is the free and unrestricted availability of research to the public, be it in libraries or over the Web. Publishers gain prestige by publishing papers in well-known journals, and the publishers (who sell the publishing service and the journals) get filthy rich. It is a concept that has been around for decades, and works well with copyright laws.


The Open Access cycle of knowledge works like this:

Professors do research in universities, and achieve great discoveries. The results of these findings are then published into a journal, which costs the professor a major fee. The publisher then exudes possession over this research, forbidding the professor from spreading that paper to third-world citizens or even the paper's co-author. The publishers then charge the university an exorbitant price for a few copies of that journal, which sit on a library shelf.

The fact is, the results of research aren't landing in the hands of those who need it, and the publishers are exacting a monopoly over this precious information. Research is only available when libraries purchase it.


Topic Summary: What Open Source can do for Open Access

One of the biggest hurdles to overcome is that university libraries are comfortable with paying publishing fees. It is difficult to convince the libraries to divert some of their funding towards "open source" solutions.

Chan then began to describe how some sites charge for access to certain journals, while other sites offer the same information for free. Publishers will often seek grants for their publishing work: some grants require the publisher make the journals available on reputable free-access servers. All of this is good progress towards true Open Access


Throughout the entire presentation, I wasn't sure what Open Source had to do with Open Access. The journals themselves can't be open source, since they aren't made of code. The servers that host free access don't necessarily use open source code.


Speaker's Background:

Leslie Chan is a lecturer at the University of Toronto's Scarborough campus. His work brings scientific journal access to developing countries around the world.


Views on Open Source:

OS is (possibly) a tool whose use of utmost importance is to balance out the costs of Open Access.


Comparison on Open Source Opinions

...


My Current Views on Open Source

Before I started DPS 909, I thought Open Source was simply a new method of programming. If you wanted a new hobby, you could look into OS. I wasn't exposed to any major OS efforts, and I dismissed it as a style of coding.

By the end of FSOSS, I've realized that Open Source is making a difference in big ways. When viewed only as a coding style, software projects are already making incredible progress beyond their proprietary counterparts. Firefox has evolved to the point that even Internet Explorer winks at it.

Were my views affected by FSOSS? I definitely had an informed view of OS before the conference, thanks to Dave Humphreys. I'd like to think that my views were developed in class and strengthened by the examples of OS communities represented at the conference.