Difference between revisions of "Talk:Firefox Performance Testing : A Python framework for Windows"
(Comparing this approach with PERL script approach) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
By: [[User: Mylau | mylau]] | By: [[User: Mylau | mylau]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Hey, | ||
| + | I am curious to know how far this python script is efficeint when we compare to the Mozilla Tinderbox Tests(PERL Scripts)! | ||
| + | http://wiki.mozilla.org/Performance:Tinderbox_Tests | ||
| + | |||
| + | sumanth krishna | ||
Revision as of 07:04, 27 November 2007
New Documentation Critique
- In the REPORTS_DIR title, "Create extension_perf_reports in C:\mozilla\testing\performance\win32\" is not necessary.
- There are two TS_URL titles in the documentation. The document should somehow tell the user that there are two TS_URL titles in the paths.py file.
- In the Config file heading, it should tell the user to redirect to the right Firefox path.
- Document should tell the user that by running the $run_tests.py config.yaml would close any existing Firefox windows.
- Document should tell the user what they should do after running the $run_tests.py config.yaml command.
By: mylau
Hey,
I am curious to know how far this python script is efficeint when we compare to the Mozilla Tinderbox Tests(PERL Scripts)!
http://wiki.mozilla.org/Performance:Tinderbox_Tests
sumanth krishna
