Difference between revisions of "SRA840 Lab1"
(→Kezhong Liang) |
(→Kezhong Liang) |
||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
3. FreeBSD supports UFS file system and Fedora supports EXT2, EXT3, and so on. | 3. FreeBSD supports UFS file system and Fedora supports EXT2, EXT3, and so on. | ||
4. GUI may not be installed on FreeBSD. | 4. GUI may not be installed on FreeBSD. | ||
| + | '''Pros of FreeBSD installation process ''' | ||
| + | Some cons here.. | ||
'''Cons of FreeBSD installation process ''' | '''Cons of FreeBSD installation process ''' | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Some Pros here... | Some Pros here... | ||
'''differences in disk drives labeling and supported file systems''' | '''differences in disk drives labeling and supported file systems''' | ||
Revision as of 01:23, 19 January 2009
SRA840 Lab1
REFERENCES
Answers
Kezhong Liang
Differences between FreeBSD and Fedora installation 1. FreeBSD uses the concept of Slice and doesn't support the operation to the logical partition. 2. FreeBSD uses one of the slice of a disk as SWAP and Fedora uses individual partition as SWAP. 3. FreeBSD supports UFS file system and Fedora supports EXT2, EXT3, and so on. 4. GUI may not be installed on FreeBSD. Pros of FreeBSD installation process Some cons here.. Cons of FreeBSD installation process Some Pros here... differences in disk drives labeling and supported file systems Something... files in the /etc directory (what each of them do) Something... setting up a network Something... start-up scripts in FreeBSD Something...
