Difference between revisions of "Firefox Performance Testing Lab Fall 2010 sbologna"

From CDOT Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 34: Line 34:
 
|| -
 
|| -
 
|| -
 
|| -
|| -
+
|| Did not work in Minefield.  Took several seconds to load which caused all other instances of Minefield to hang.  When it did load, all attempts to interact with the test caused Minefield to hang again in exactly the same way.  Chromium ran it fine.
 
|-
 
|-
 
|33
 
|33

Latest revision as of 14:50, 17 September 2010

Firefox Information

Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:2.0b7pre) Gecko/20100914 Firefox/4.0b7pre

Chromium Information

Version 7.0.526.0 (59515)

Graphics

Adapter Description: NVIDIA GeForce 8800GT
Vendor ID: 10de
Device ID: 0611
Adapter RAM: 512
Adapter Drivers: nvd3dum nvwgf2um
Driver Version: 7.15.11.7545
Driver Date: 8-22-2008
Direct2D Enabled: false
DirectWrite Enabled: false
GPU Accelerated Windows: 2/2 Direct3D 9


Test Notes

Test Number Name & URL Tester Date Firefox Performance - Speed Firefox Performance - Smoothness Firefox Performance - Responsiveness Notes and other Details
31 Canvas 3d Engine Stephen Bologna Sept 15 2010 Speed was very good, same as Chromium Firefox was able to rotate the flat 2d images noticeably better than Chromium 'Clicking Rampages' were handled about the same in each browser. In each case, there was a slight lag when the rampage began, but it caught up quickly Overall, Firefox definitely outperformed Chromium here.
32 Lorenz 84 Stephen Bologna Sept 15 2010 - - - Did not work in Minefield. Took several seconds to load which caused all other instances of Minefield to hang. When it did load, all attempts to interact with the test caused Minefield to hang again in exactly the same way. Chromium ran it fine.
33 Apophis 2029 Stephen Bologna Sept 15 2010 The foreground effects were noticeably slower in Firefox Both browsers were about the same Controls felt slightly more sluggish in Firefox This one was noticeably faster in Chromium
34 Bing-Bong! Stephen Bologna Sept 15 2010 Very fast Very smooth Very responsive Both browsers performed equally well
35 JuicyDrop Stephen Bologna Sept 15 2010 Very fast Very smooth Very responsive One of the visualization effects didn't work quite right in Chromium (and it REALLY stood out). Firefox on the other hand handled all of them without any trouble. Other than that, both browsers had equally high speed, smoothness and responsiveness. Because of the issue with visualization, I would give this one to Firefox
36 HasCanvas Stephen Bologna Sept 15 2010 Chromium was faster Both browsers were the same Both browsers were the same There was some start up lag in both browsers. This was more noticeable on Chromium. Still, Chromium outperformed Minefield
37 Canvas Sketch Stephen Bologna Sept 15 2010 Both browsers were the same Both browsers were the same 'Clicking Rampages' caused Minefield to slow slightly. This did not happen in Chromium The slowdowns mentioned in responsiveness was the only issue I could find in either browser. Chromium just narrowly outperformed Minefield
38 World of Solitaire Stpehen Bologna Sept 15 2010 Chromium was slightly better Both browsers were the same Chromium was slightly better There was an in-game option to adjust the speed. Using this option, Chromium displayed a more varied difference between its top speed and its lowest speed. Chromium outperformed Minefield
39 Google Sphere Stephen Bologna Sept 15 2010 Chromium was much faster Both browsers were the same Both browsers were the same Minefield's presentation looked much sloppier than Chromium. In Minefield, as the text got closer to the screen and grew larger, it also appeared to become 'bold' and less legible. Chromium very much outperformed Minefield here
40 JS Fireworks Stephen Bologna Sept 15 2010 Very fast There was a small amount of lag in the first second or two when the visualizations started in Firefox. Once things got going however, both browsers were very smooth Very responsive Both browsers performed equally well