1
edit
Changes
→Results
<tr>
<tr>
<td>62</td>
<td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/rotten/ Rotten]</td>
<td>Brian Law</td>
<td>15/09/2010</td>
<td>Uses a lot of CPU resources, similar to test 61 it sits at 50%.</td>
<td>It stutters a lot.</td>
<td>Is decently responsive to mouse clicks.</td>
<td>This test also runs much better on Chromium, which used less resources and looked much smoother</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>63</td>
<td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/waterfall/ WaterFall]</td>
<td>Brian Law</td>
<td>15/09/2010</td>
<td>Slowed down over time</td>
<td>Only the first 10 seconds was smooth.</td>
<td>N/A</td>
<td>Chromium performed much better yet again, staying smooth for much longer.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<!-- Test No. -->
<td>6264</td>
<!-- Test Name -->
<td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/rottenanother-world-js/ RottenAnother World JS]</td>
<!-- Tester -->
<td>Brian Law</td>
<td>15/09/2010</td>
<!-- Firefox Performance - Speed-->
<td>Uses a lot of CPU resources, similar to test 61 it sits at 50%.</td>
<!-- Firefox Performance - Smoothness-->
<td>It stutters a lot.</td>
<!-- Firefox Performance - Responsiveness-->
<td>Is decently responsive to mouse clicks.</td>
<!-- Notes and other Details -->
<td>This test also runs much better on Chromium, which used less resources and looked much smoother</td>
</tr>
<!-- Test No. -->
<td></td>
