Difference between revisions of "Firefox Performance Testing Lab Fall 2010 blaw1"

From CDOT Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Results)
(Results)
Line 115: Line 115:
 
   <tr>
 
   <tr>
 
   <tr>
 
   <tr>
 +
      <td>62</td> 
 +
      <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/rotten/ Rotten]</td>
 +
      <td>Brian Law</td>
 +
      <td>15/09/2010</td>
 +
      <td>Uses a lot of CPU resources, similar to test 61 it sits at 50%.</td>
 +
      <td>It stutters a lot.</td>
 +
      <td>Is decently responsive to mouse clicks.</td>
 +
      <td>This test also runs much better on Chromium, which used less resources and looked much smoother</td> 
 +
  </tr>
 +
<tr>
 +
      <td>63</td> 
 +
      <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/waterfall/ WaterFall]</td>
 +
      <td>Brian Law</td>
 +
      <td>15/09/2010</td>
 +
      <td>Slowed down over time</td>
 +
      <td>Only the first 10 seconds was smooth.</td>
 +
      <td>N/A</td>
 +
      <td>Chromium performed much better yet again, staying smooth for much longer.</td> 
 +
  </tr>
 +
<tr>
 
       <!-- Test No. -->  
 
       <!-- Test No. -->  
       <td>62</td>  
+
       <td>64</td>  
 
       <!-- Test Name -->     
 
       <!-- Test Name -->     
       <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/rotten/ Rotten]</td>  
+
       <td>[http://www.chromeexperiments.com/detail/another-world-js/ Another World JS]</td>  
 
       <!-- Tester -->   
 
       <!-- Tester -->   
 
       <td>Brian Law</td>  
 
       <td>Brian Law</td>  
Line 124: Line 144:
 
       <td>15/09/2010</td>  
 
       <td>15/09/2010</td>  
 
       <!-- Firefox Performance - Speed-->
 
       <!-- Firefox Performance - Speed-->
       <td>Uses a lot of CPU resources, similar to test 61 it sits at 50%.</td>  
+
       <td></td>  
 
       <!-- Firefox Performance - Smoothness-->
 
       <!-- Firefox Performance - Smoothness-->
       <td>It stutters a lot.</td>  
+
       <td></td>  
 
       <!-- Firefox Performance - Responsiveness-->
 
       <!-- Firefox Performance - Responsiveness-->
       <td>Is decently responsive to mouse clicks.</td>  
+
       <td></td>  
 
       <!-- Notes and other Details -->     
 
       <!-- Notes and other Details -->     
       <td>This test also runs much better on Chromium, which used less resources and looked much smoother</td>   
+
       <td></td>   
 
   </tr>
 
   </tr>
<tr>
+
 
 +
<tr>
 
       <!-- Test No. -->  
 
       <!-- Test No. -->  
 
       <td></td>  
 
       <td></td>  

Revision as of 14:52, 15 September 2010

Test Results (Brian Law)

Go back to lab page

Hardware Info

Adapter Description NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
Vendor ID 10de
Device ID 0605
Adapter RAM 512
Adapter Drivers nvd3dum nvwgf2um,nvwgf2um
Driver Version 8.17.11.9621
Driver Date 1-11-2010
Direct2D Enabled true
DirectWrite Enabled true
GPU Accelerated Windows 1/1 Direct3D 9

Minefield Build

  • Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:2.0b7pre) Gecko/20100914 Firefox/4.0b7pre

Chromium Build

  • Chromium 7.0.525.0 (59494)


Results

Test No. Test Name Tester Date Firefox Performance - Speed Firefox Performance - Smoothness Firefox Performance - Responsiveness Notes and other Details
61 3D Waveform Brian Law 15/09/2010 Used about 50% of my CPU power. It didn't run smoothly at all, very choppy. Followed mouse movements well. This test runs a bit smoother on Chromium, and used roughly 40% CPU power.
62 Rotten Brian Law 15/09/2010 Uses a lot of CPU resources, similar to test 61 it sits at 50%. It stutters a lot. Is decently responsive to mouse clicks. This test also runs much better on Chromium, which used less resources and looked much smoother
63 WaterFall Brian Law 15/09/2010 Slowed down over time Only the first 10 seconds was smooth. N/A Chromium performed much better yet again, staying smooth for much longer.
64 Another World JS Brian Law 15/09/2010
Brian Law 15/09/2010